Thursday, January 27, 2011

Efficaciousness Of School Districts Websites/BLOG 2

After perusing several school districts websites I decided to do a comparative content assessment. All of these sites were relatively good. I weighted my assessment on presentation and layout. I noticed that some were more esthetically pleasing than others but came up short on content. I will proceed with elaborating on the first website that had the most relevant content and the last one having the least. All of these schools were listed by US Census from the lowest DFG(District Factor Group) A, the highest being J. I decided to use the middle, which would be CD and FG.

The first of the districts websites was Hamiliton Township Schools. The content of this website wasn't the most aesthetic, however the ease of finding relevant information was commendable. This site in my opinion was the best of them all. The tabs were boldly labeled and I was able to find all the information that would be important to the students as well as the parents. The most noticeable subcategories under the "Parental Information" are the following; Important Policies and School to Parent Initiative.What was there not to like about this site. I found it rather awkward that they had a category for teacher evaluations. It only detailed standards by which teachers and staff were evaluated.

The second district website was Bayonne Board of Education. This DFG was also in the CD category. This site had a tab labeled "Parental Resources" and it had relevant information from the schools breakfast and lunch menu, national math standards to parent notification. I think they should have included information about school policies. What not to like about this site? This site was planned well and relevant information was strategically placed, however in my opinion wasn't able to navigate with as much ease as Hamilton Townships site.

The third of the district website was Somerville School. This DFG was in the FG category. In my opinion there was nothing special about this site at all. It appears that this may have been a recently constructed site that may have used a generic template. This could be the reason for the lack of relevant content. This site had a tab called "Parental Portal" where the parent had to login to an application called "Power School". Authorization is needed to log in. It is my hope that parents are only able to access information about their child only because this application is used by teachers for all student grades and attendance.

I was able to find one district with teachers websites. There wasn't even enough information to evaluate. I clicked through at least 15.

This exercise was very insightful. Ideally, it will be most beneficial if I am designated or asked to help design a site for the school where I will be teaching.

4 comments:

  1. Good critique. Part of the assignment was to link the website.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's interesting to see such differences in websites from the same or adjacent District Factor Groups.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am wondering the reason for lack of teacher websites, and I would assume it could be due to any number of factors. Are teachers unfamiliar with the technology? Do teachers have the time necessary to maintain their website? Do teachers themselves find creating and updating a personal website to be useful and an enhancement to their pedagogy?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I found this assignment to be interesting as well. While looking for the perfect DFG to research, I also found myself clicking away at multiple websites to find the most elaborate website to explore. I wonder if the schools plan on updating their websites to be more informative or if they are content with how they appear today?

    ReplyDelete